Article | Valuation Studies | What Is a Good Tomato? A Case of Valuing in Practice





Title:
What Is a Good Tomato? A Case of Valuing in Practice
Author:
Frank Heuts: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Annemarie Mol: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
DOI:
10.3384/vs.2001-5992.1312125
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Abstract:
As a contribution to the field of valuation studies this article lays out a number of lessons that follow from an exploratory inquiry into ‘good tomatoes’. We held interviews with tomato experts (developers, growers, sellers, processors, professional cooks and so-called consumers) in the Netherlands and analysed the transcriptions carefully. Grouping our informants’ concerns with tomatoes into clusters, we differentiate between five registers of valuing. These have to do with money, handling, historical time, what it is to be natural, and sensual appeal. There are tensions between and within these registers that lead to clashes and compromises. Accordingly, valuing tomatoes does not fit into inclusive formal schemes. Neither is it simply a matter of making judgements. Our informants told us how they know whether a tomato is good, but also revealed what they do to make tomatoes good. Their valuing includes activities such as pruning tomato plants and preparing tomato dishes. But if such activities are meant to make tomatoes good, success is never guaranteed. This prompts us to import the notion of care. Care does not offer control, but involves sustained and respectful tinkering towards improvement. Which is not to say in the end the tomatoes our informants care for are good. In the end these tomatoes get eaten. And while eating performs tomatoes as ‘good to eat’, it also finishes them off. Valuing may lead on to destruction. An important lesson for valuation studies indeed.
Keywords:
Valuation; valuing; practice; performativity; eating; food; care; tomatoes
Year:
2013
Volume:
1
Issue:
2
Pages:
125-146
No. of pages:
22
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2013-11-27

Volume 1, Issue: 2, Article 2, 2013

Author:
Frank Heuts, Annemarie Mol
Title:
What Is a Good Tomato? A Case of Valuing in Practice:
DOI:
10.3384/vs.2001-5992.1312125
References:

Abrahamsson, Sebastian, and Paul Simpson. 2011. “The Limits of the Body: Boundaries, Capacities, Thresholds.” Social & Cultural Geography 12 (4): 331–338. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2011.579696

Allen, Arthur. 2010. Ripe: The Search for the Perfect Tomato. Berkeley: Counterpoint Press.

Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barndt, Deborah. 2002. Tangled Routes: Women, Work, and Globalization on the Tomato Trail. Lanham, London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bertoni, Filippo. 2013. “Soil and Worm: On Eating as Relating.” Science as Culture 22 (1): 61–85. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2013.776365

Boisard, Pierre, and Marie-Thérèse Letablier. 1989. “Un compromis d’innovation entre tradition et standardisation dans l’industrie laitière.” In Justesse et justice dans la travail, edited by Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot, 209–218. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot, eds. 1989. Justesse et justice dans le travail. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Callon, Michel, Cécile Méadel, and Vololona Rabeharisoa. 2002. “The Economy of Qualities.” Economy and Society 31: 194–217. DOI: 10.1080/03085140220123126

Dodier, Nicolas. 2012. “Ordre, force, pluralité. Articuler description et critique autour des questions médicales.” In Faire des Sciences Sociales: Critiquer, edited by Pascale Haag and Cyril Lemieux, 317–342. Paris: Les Editions EHESS.

Gomart, Emile, and Antoine Hennion. 1999. “A Sociology of Attachment: Music Lovers, Drug Addicts.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, 220–47. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Gould, Wilbur. 1992. Tomato Production, Processing & Technology. Timonium: CTI Publications. DOI: 10.1533/9781845696146

Greaber, David. 2002. Towards an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. Palgrave McMillan.

Harbers, Hans. 2010. “Animal Love Stories: About Care and Economy.” In  Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, edited by Annemarie Mol, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols, 141–170. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

Helgesson, Claes-Fredrik, and Fabian Muniesa 2013. “For What It’s Worth: An Introduction to Valuation Studies.” Valuation Studies 1 (1): 1–10. DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.13111

Hennion, Antoine. 2001. “Music Lovers: Taste as Performance.” Theory, Culture, Society 18 (5):1–22. DOI: 10.1177/02632760122051940

Hennion, Antoine. 2004. “Pragmatics of Taste.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture, edited by Mark Jacobs and Nancy Weiss Hanradan, 131–144. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.

Hennion, Antoine. 2007. “Those Things That Hold Us Together: Taste and Sociology.” Cultural Sociology 1 (1): 97–114. DOI: 10.1177/1749975507073923

Howes, David. 1991. The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Kjellberg, Hans, Alexandre Mallard, Diane-Laure Arjaliès, Patrik Aspers, Stefan Beljean, Alexandra Bidet, Alberto Corsín, Emmanuel Didier, Marion Fourcade, Susi Geiger, Klaus Hoeyer, Michèle Lamont, Donald MacKenzie, Bill Maurer, Jan Mouritsen, Ebba Sjögren, Kjell Tryggestad, François Vatin, and Steve Woolgar. 2013. “Valuation Studies? Our Collective Two Cents.” Valuation Studies 1 (1): 11–30. DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131111

Kuipers, Giselinde. (2006) Good Humor, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110898996

Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30: 225–248. DOI: 10.1086/421123

Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.

Law, John. 2002. Aircraft stories: Decentering the Object of Technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822383543

Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge.

Mann, Anna, Annemarie Mol, Priya Satalkar, Amalinda Savirani, Nasima Selim, Malini Sur, and Emily Yates-Doerr. 2011. “Mixing Methods, Tasting Fingers: Notes on an Ethnographic Experiment.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1 (1): 221–243. DOI: 10.14318/hau1.1.009

Méadel, Cécile, and Vololona Rabeharisoa. 2001. “Taste as a Form of Adjustment between Food and Consumers.” In Technology and the Market: Demand, Users and Innovation, edited by Rod Coombs, Ken Green, Albert Richards, and Vivien Walsh, 234–253. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781843762867.00019

Meyers, Fred, ed. 2002. The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Mol, Annemarie. 2008a. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge.

Mol, Annemarie. 2008b. “I Eat an Apple: On Theorizing Subjectivities.” Subjectivitiy 22: 28–37. DOI: 10.1057/sub.2008.2

Mol, Annemarie. 2011. “The Ability to Taste: The Eating Body between Laboratory and Clinic.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by Frances Maschia-Lees, 467–480. Wiley-Blackwell.

Mol, Annemarie. 2012. “Mind Your Plate! The Ontonorms of Dutch Dieting.” Social Studies of Science 43: 379–396. DOI: 10.1177/0306312712456948

Mol, Annemarie. Forthcoming. “Language Trails: ‘Lekker’ and Its Pleasures.” To appear in Theory, Culture & Society.

Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols, eds. 2010. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

Pollan, Michael. 2002. The Botany of Desire: A Plant’s-Eye View of the World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Pols, Jeanette. 2006. “Accounting and Washing: Good Care in Long-Term Psychiatry.” Science, Technology & Human Values 31 (4): 409–430. DOI: 10.1177/0162243906287544

Rosset, Peter, Robert Rice, and Michael Watts. 1999. “Thailand and the World Tomato: Globalization, New Agricultural Countries (NACs) and the Agrarian Question.” International Journal of Sociology of Agricultural and Food 8: 71–85.

Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. DOI: 10.1177/030631289019003001

Struhkamp, Rita, Annemarie Mol, and Tjalling Swierstra. 2009. “Dealing with Independence: Doctoring in Physical Rehabilitation Practice.” Science, Technology & Human Values 34: 55–76. DOI: 10.1177/0162243907312954

Thévenot, Laurent. 2001. “Organizing Complexity: Conventions of Coordination and the Composition of Economic Arrangements.” European Journal of Social Theory 4 (4): 405–425. DOI: 10.1177/13684310122225235

Thévenot, Laurent. 2002. “Which Road to Follow? The Moral Complexity of an ‘Equipped’ Humanity.” In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, edited by John Law and Annemarie Mol, 53–87. Durham/London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822383550-003

Vatin, François. 2013. “Valuation as Evaluation and Valorizing.” Valuation Studies 1(1): 31–50. DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131131

Watson, James L., and Melissa L. Caldwell. 2005. The Cultural Politics of Food and Eating. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Whatmore, Sarah. 2002. Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. London: Sage.

Yates-Doerr, Emily. 2012. “Meeting the Demand for Meat?” Anthropology today 28(1): 11–15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2012.00849.x

Volume 1, Issue: 2, Article 2, 2013

Author:
Frank Heuts, Annemarie Mol
Title:
What Is a Good Tomato? A Case of Valuing in Practice:
DOI:
10.3384/vs.2001-5992.1312125
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
  • Maximilian Fochler, Ulrike Fel & Ruth Müller (2016). Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists’ Work and Lives. Minerva, 54(2): 175. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-016-9292-y
  • Hilmar Schäfer (2016). „Outstanding universal value“. Die Arbeit an der Universalisierung des Wertvollen im UNESCO-Welterbe. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 26(3-4): 353. DOI: 10.1007/s11609-017-0329-3
  • Jennifer Atchison (2015). Experiments in co-existence: the science and practices of biocontrol in invasive species management. Environment and Planning A, 47(8): 1697. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X15597106
  • Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Francis Le & Lisa Lindén (2016). Valuations of experimental designs in proteomic biomarker experiments and traditional randomised controlled trials. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(2): 157. DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2015.1108215
  • Paul Stenner (2016). On standards and values: Between finite actuality and infinite possibility. Theory & Psychology, 26(2): 144. DOI: 10.1177/0959354316630619
  • Amalie Martinus Hauge (2016). The Organizational Valuation of Valuation Devices: Putting Lean whiteboard management to work in a hospital department. Valuation Studies, 4(2): 125. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.1642125
  • Bethaney Turner, Joanna Henryks, George Mai & Kirsten Wehner (2017). Tinkering at the Limits: agricultural shows, small-scale producers and ecological connections. Australian Geographer, 48(2): 185. DOI: 10.1080/00049182.2016.1184783
  • Mattijs van de Por & Annemarie Mol (2015). Chupar frutasin Salvador da Bahia: a case of practice-specific alterities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21(1): 165. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.12151
  • Yuti Ariani Fatimah (2015). Fantasy, values, and identity in biofuel innovation: Examining the promise of Jatropha for Indonesia. Energy Research & Social Science, 7: 108. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.04.002
  • Nick Verkad & Johanna Höffken (2017). Is the Resource Man coming home? Engaging with an energy monitoring platform to foster flexible energy consumption in the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 27: 36. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.015
  • Carina Ren, Morten Krogh Peterse & Dianne Dredge (2015). Guest Editorial: Valuing Tourism. Valuation Studies, 3(2): 85. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.153285
  • Lukas Rieppel (2015). Prospecting for dinosaurs on the mining frontier: The value of information in America’s Gilded Age. Social Studies of Science, 45(2): 161. DOI: 10.1177/0306312715570650
  • Michiel Korthals (2017). Ethics of Dietary Guidelines: Nutrients, Processes and Meals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, : . DOI: 10.1007/s10806-017-9674-7
  • Morten Nissen, Dorthe Staunæ & Mads Bank (2016). A “post-psychological” curiosity about subjectivities and standards. Theory & Psychology, 26(2): 137. DOI: 10.1177/0959354316628691
  • Anna Krzywoszynska (2015). Wine is not Coca-Cola: marketization and taste in alternative food networks. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(3): 491. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-014-9564-9
  • René van der Duim, Carina Re & Gunnar Thór Jóhannesson (2017). ANT: A decade of interfering with tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 64: 139. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2017.03.006
  • (2014). Drivers of emerging risks and their interactions in the domain of biological risks to animal, plant and public health: a pilot study. EFSA Supporting Publications, 11(4): . DOI: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2014.EN-588
  • Laura Centemeri (2015). François Vatin (Ed.): Évaluer et valoriser: une sociologie économique de la mesure (nouvelle édition revue et augmentée). Human Studies, 38(1): 179. DOI: 10.1007/s10746-014-9336-y
  • Ruth Mülle & Sarah de Rijcke (2017). Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences. Research Evaluation, 26(3): 157. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvx023
  • Sebastian Abrahamsson (2014). Cooking, eating and digesting: Notes on the emergent normativities of food and speeds. Time & Society, 23(3): 287. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X14549511
  • Kasja Weenink, Noelle Aart & Sandra Jacobs (2017). Playing language games: higher education quality dynamics in Dutch national policies since 1985. Critical Policy Studies, : 1. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2017.1300540
  • Morten Krogh Peterse & Carina Ren (2015). "Much More than a Song Contest": Exploring Eurovision 2014 as Potlatch. Valuation Studies, 3(2): 97. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.153297
  • Export in BibTex, RIS or text