Article | Valuation Studies | The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project

The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project
Véra Ehrenstein: Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France Fabian Muniesa: Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
This paper examines counterfactual display in the valuation of carbon offsetting projects. Considered a legitimate way to encourage climate change mitigation, such projects rely on the establishment of procedures for the prospective assessment of their capacity to become carbon sinks. This requires imagining possible worlds and assessing their plausibility. The world inhabited by the project is articulated through conditional formulation and subjected to what we call “counterfactual display”: the production and circulation of documents that demonstrate and con!gure the counterfactual valuation. We present a case study on one carbon offsetting reforestation project in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We analyse the construction of the scene that allows the “What would have happened” question to make sense and become actionable. We highlight the operations of calculative framing that this requires, the reality constraints it relies upon, and the entrepreneurial conduct it stimulates.
Carbon offsetting; reforestation; Democratic Republic of Congo; valuation; counterfactuals
No. of pages:
Publication type:

Volume 1, Issue: 2, Article 4, 2013

Véra Ehrenstein, Fabian Muniesa
The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project:

Armatte, Michel. 2008. “Climate Change: Scenarios and Integrated Modelling.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 33 (1): 37–50. DOI: 10.1179/030801808X259989

Bäckstrand, Karin, and Eva Lövbrand. 2006. “Planting Trees to Mitigate Climate Change: Contested Discourses of Ecological Modernization, Green Governmentality and Civic Environmentalism.” Global Environmental Politics 6 (1): 50–75. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.50

Beckert, Jens. 2013a. “Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations in the Economy.” Theory and Society 42 (3): 219–240. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2

Beckert, Jens. 2013b. “Capitalism as a System of Expectations: Toward a Sociological Microfoundation of Political Economy.” Politics and Society 41 (3): 323–350.

Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.

Boyd, Emily, Esteve Corbera, and Manuel Estrada. 2008. “UNFCCC Negotiations (Pre-Kyoto to COP-9): What the Process Says About the Politics of CDM-Sinks.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 8 (2): 95–112. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-008-9070-x

Boyd, Emily. 2009. “Governing the Clean Development Mechanism: Global Rhetoric Versus Local Realities in Carbon Sequestration Projects.” Environment and Planning A 41 (10): 2380–2395. DOI: 10.1068/a41341

Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by John Law, 196–233. London: Routledge.

Callon, Michel. 1998. “An Essay on Framing an Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology.” In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michel Callon, 244–269. Oxford: Blackwell.

Callon, Michel. 2009. “Civilizing Markets: Carbon Trading Between In Vitro and In Vivo Experiments.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (3–4): 535–548. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.04.003

Callon, Michel, and Bruno Latour. 1981. “Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macrostructure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So.” In Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, edited by Karin Knorr-Cetina and Aaron V. Cicourel, 277–303. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Callon, Michel, and Fabian Muniesa. 2005. “Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices.” Organization Studies 26 (8): 1229–1250. DOI: 10.1177/0170840605056393

Corbera, Esteve, and Katrina Brown. 2008. “Building Institutions to Trade Ecosystem Services: Marketing Forest Carbon in Mexico.” World Development 36 (10): 1956–1979. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.010

Dahan, Amy, 2010. “Putting the Earth System in a Numerical Box? The Evolution from Climate Modeling Toward Global Change.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (3): 282–292. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.08.002

Doganova, Liliana, and Marie Eyquem-Renault. 2009. “What Do Business Models Do? Innovation Devices in Technology Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy 38 (10): 1559–1570. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002

Eco, Umberto. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Edwards, Paul N., Stephen H. Schneider. 2001. “Self-Governance and Peer Review in Science-for-Policy: The Case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report.” In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, edited by Clark A. Miller and Paul N. Edwards, 219-246. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Elyachar, Julia. 2005. Markets of Dispossession: NGOs, Economic Development, and the State in Cairo. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822387138

Edwards, Paul N. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Fogel, Cathleen. 2004. “The Local, the Global, and the Kyoto Protocol.” In Earthly politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, edited by Sheila Jasanoff and Marybeth Long Martello, 103–125. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI. 10.1057/9780230594180

Fourcade, Marion. 2011. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of ‘Nature’.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (6): 1721–1777. DOI: 10.1086/659640

Giraudeau, Martin. 2008. “The Drafts of Strategy: Opening up Plans and their Uses.” Long Range Planning 41 (3): 291–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2008.03.001

Grubb, Michael, Tim Laing, Thomas Counsell, Tand Catherine Willan. 2011. “Global Carbon Mechanisms: Lessons and Implications.” Climatic Change 104(3–4): 539–573. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9791-z

Guyer, Jane I. 2007. “Prophecy and the Near Future: Thoughts on Macroeconomic, Evangelical, and Punctuated Time.” American Ethnologist 34 (3): 409–421. DOI: 10.1525/ae.2007.34.3.409

Huault, Isabelle, and Hélène Rainelli-Weiss. 2011. “A Market for Weather Risk? Conflicting Metrics, Attempts at Compromise, and Limits to Commensuration.” Organization Studies 32 (10): 1395–1419. DOI: 10.1177/0170840611421251

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.

Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47 (2): 119–146. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4

Latour, Bruno. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World.” In Science Observed: New Perspectives on the Social Studies of Science, edited by Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay, 141–170. London: Sage.

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lave, Rebecca, Martin Doyle, and Morgan Robertson. 2010. “Privatizing Stream Restoration in the US.” Social Studies of Science 40 (5): 677–703. DOI: 10.1177/0306312710379671

Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Leyshon, Andrew, and Nigel Thrift. 2007. “The Capitalization of Almost Everything: The Future of Finance and Capitalism.” Theory, Culture and Society 24 (7–8): 97–115. DOI: 10.1177/0263276407084699

Li, Tania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822389781

Lohmann, Larry. 2005. “Marketing and Making Carbon Dumps: Commodification, Calculation and Counterfactuals in Climate Change Mitigation.” Science as Culture 14 (3), 203–235. DOI: 10.1080/09505430500216783

Lohmann, Larry. 2009. “Toward a Different Debate in Environmental Accounting: The Cases of Carbon and Cost-Benefit.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (3–4): 499–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.002

Lövbrand, Eva. 2009. “Revisiting the Politics of Expertise in Light of the Kyoto Negotiations on Land Use Change and Forestry.” Forest Policy and Economics 11 (5): 404–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.08.007

Lövbrand, Eva, and Johannes Stripple. 2012. “Disrupting the Public-Private Distinction: Excavating the Government of Carbon Markets Post-Copenhagen.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (4): 658–674. DOI: 10.1068/c11137

Lovell, Heather, and Diana Liverman. 2010. “Understanding Carbon Offset Technologies.” New Political Economy 15 (2): 255–273. DOI: 10.1080/13563460903548699

MacKenzie, Donald. 2009a. Material Markets: How Economic Agents are Constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MacKenzie, Donald. 2009b. “Making Things the Same: Gases, Emission Rights and the Politics of Carbon Markets.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (3–4): 440–455. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004

Mallard, Grégoire, and Andrew Lakoff. 2011. “How Claims to Know the Future Are Used to Understand the Present.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Charles Camic, Neil Gross and Michèle Lamont, 339–377. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Maurer, Bill. 2002. “Repressed Futures: Financial Derivatives’ Theological Unconscious.” Economy and Society 31 (1): 15–36. DOI: 10.1080/03085140120109231

Michaelowa, Axel. 2005. “Determination of Baselines and Additionality for the CDM: A Crucial Element of Credibility of the Climate Regime.” In Climate Change and Carbon Markets: A Handbook of Emissions Reduction Mechanisms, edited by Farhana Yamin, 289–304. London: Earthscan.

Miller, Clark A. 2004. “Climate Science and the Making of a Global Political Order.” In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, 46–66. Abingdon, Routledge.

Mitchell, Timothy. 2007. “The Properties of Markets.” In Do Economists Make Markets? On The Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa and Lucia Siu, 244–275. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Miyazaki, Hirokazu. 2006. “Economy of Dreams: Hope in Global Capitalism and Its Critiques.” Cultural Anthropology 21 (2):147–172. DOI: 10.1525/can.2006.21.2.147

Muniesa, Fabian. 2012. “A Flank Movement in the Understanding of Valuation.” In Measure and Value, edited by Lisa Adkins and Celia Lury, 24–38. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Muniesa, Fabian. Forthcoming. The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Abingdon: Routledge.

Neyland, Daniel, and Elena Simakova. 2009. “How far can we push sceptical reflexivity? An analysis of marketing ethics and the certification of poverty.” Journal of Marketing Management 25 (7–8): 777–794. DOI: 10.1362/026725709X471622

Nitzan, Jonathan, and Shimshon Bichler. 2009. Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder. Abingdon, Routledge.

Ortiz, Horacio. 2013. “Financial Value: Economic, Moral, Political, Global.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (1): 64–79. DOI: 10.14318/hau3.1.005

Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Schneider, Lambert. 2009. “Assessing the Additionality of CDM Projects: Practical Experiences and Lessons Learned.” Climate Policy 9 (3): 242–254. DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0533

Stalnaker, Robert C. 1976. “Possible Worlds.” Noûs 10 (1): 65–75. DOI: 10.2307/2214477

Stalnaker, Robert C. 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Tsing, Anna. 2000. “Inside the Economy of Appearances.” Public Culture 12 (1): 115–144. DOI: 10.1215/08992363-12-1-115

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 1997. “Decision 1/CP.3.” In Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Annex, 7-30 (FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1). Bonn: UNFCCC.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2001. “Decision 17/CP.7.” In Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakech from October 29 to November  10, 2001, Addendum, Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties, Volume 2, 20-79 (FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2). Bonn: UNFCCC.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2005. “Decision 5/CMP.1.” In Report of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its First Session, Held at Montreal from November 28 to December 10, 2005, Addendum, Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, 61-80 (FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.1). Bonn: UNFCCC.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2007. “A/R Methodological Tool: Combined Tool to Identify the Baseline Scenario and Demonstrate Additionality in A/R CDM Project Activity.” In Executive Board of The Clean Development Mechanism Thirty-Fifth Meeting Report, Annex 19, 1–13. Bonn: UNFCCC.

Volume 1, Issue: 2, Article 4, 2013

Véra Ehrenstein, Fabian Muniesa
The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project:
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
  • Steffen Dalsgaard (2016). Carbon Valuation: Alternatives, Alternations and Lateral Measures?. Valuation Studies, 4(1): 67. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.164167
  • Trine Pallesen (2016). Valuation struggles over pricing – determining the worth of wind power. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(6): 527. DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2016.1212084
  • Adrian Nel (2017). Contested carbon: Carbon forestry as a speculatively virtual, falteringly material and disputed territorial assemblage. Geoforum, 81: 144. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.007
  • Matthew Kearne & Lauren Rickards (2016). Earthly graves for environmental futures: Techno-burial practices. Futures, : . DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.12.003
  • Export in BibTex, RIS or text