Article | Valuation Studies | Valuation Studies and the Critique of Valuation





Title:
Valuation Studies and the Critique of Valuation
Author:
Liliana Doganova: Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France Martin Giraudeau: Department of Accounting, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK Claes-Fredrik Helgesson: Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Sweden Hans Kjellberg: Department of Marketing and Strategy, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden Francis Lee: Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Sweden Alexandre Mallard: Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France Andrea Mennicken: Department of Accounting, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK Fabian Muniesa: Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France Ebba Sjögren: Department of Accounting, Stockholm School of Economics, France Teun Zuiderent-Jerak: Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, France
DOI:
10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142287
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Abstract:
Not available
Keywords:
Not available
Year:
2014
Volume:
2
Issue:
2
Pages:
87-96
No. of pages:
10
Publication type:
Editorial note
Published:
2014-12-16

Volume 2, Issue: 2, Article 1, 2014

Author:
Liliana Doganova, Martin Giraudeau, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Hans Kjellberg, Francis Lee, Alexandre Mallard, Andrea Mennicken, Fabian Muniesa, Ebba Sjögren, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak
Title:
Valuation Studies and the Critique of Valuation:
DOI:
10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142287
References:

Akrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe Bijker and John Law, 205–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Becker, Howard S. 1967. “Whose Side Are We On?” Social Problems 14 (3): 239–247. DOI: 10.2307/799147

Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.

Boltanski, Luc. 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity.

Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bruno, Isabelle, Emmanuel Didier, and Julien Prévieux. 2014. Statactivisme: Comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: La Découverte.

Callon, Michel, and Bruno Latour. 1992. “Don’t Throw the Baby Out With the Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearley.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering, 343–368. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Collins, Harry M., and Stephen Yearley. 1992a. “Epistemological Chicken.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering, 301–326. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Collins, Harry M., and Stephen Yearley. 1992b. “Journey into Space.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 369–389.

Fourcade, Marion. 2011. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of ‘Nature’.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (6): 1721–1777. DOI: 10.1086/659640

Galison, Peter. 1996. “Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone.” In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Peter Galison and David J. Stump, 118–157. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Gomart, Emilie, and Antoine Hennion. 1999. “A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, 220–247. Oxford: Blackwell.

Graeber, David. 2004. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Haraway, Donna J. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. DOI: 10.2307/3178066

Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Harding, Sandra. 1991. “Feminist Standpoint Epistemology.” In The Gender and Science Reader, edited by Ingrid Bartsch and Muriel Lederman,145–168. London: Routledge.

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry, 30(2): 225–248. DOI: 10.1086/421123

Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno, Graham Harman, and Peter Erdélyi. 2011. The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Hants: Zero Books.

Law, John. 1992. “Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity.” Systems Practice 5 (4): 379–393. DOI: 10.1007/BF01059830

Puig de la Bellacasa, María. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: assembling neglected things.” Social Studies of Science, 41(1): 85–106. DOI: 10.1177/0306312710380301

Scott, James C. 2012. Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Verran, Helen. 1999. “Staying True to the Laughter in Nigerian Classrooms.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, 136–155. Oxford: Blackwell.

Verran, Helen. 2001. Science and an African Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Verran, Helen. 2014. “Extending the Cosmopolitical Right to Non–Humans.” Valuation Studies 2 (1): 65–70. DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142165

Woodhouse, Edward, David Hess, Steve Breyman, and Brian Martin. 2002. “Science Studies and Activism: Possibilities and Problems for Reconstructivist Agendas.” Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 297–319. DOI: 10.1177/0306312702032002004

Woolgar, Steve, Tarek Cheniti, Javier Lezaun, Daniel Neyland, Chris Sugden, and Christian Toennesen. 2008. “A Turn to Ontology in STS? 1.2.” Paper prepared for the workshop A Turn to Ontology, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford.

Volume 2, Issue: 2, Article 1, 2014

Author:
Liliana Doganova, Martin Giraudeau, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Hans Kjellberg, Francis Lee, Alexandre Mallard, Andrea Mennicken, Fabian Muniesa, Ebba Sjögren, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak
Title:
Valuation Studies and the Critique of Valuation:
DOI:
10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142287
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
  • Amalie Martinus Hauge (2016). The Organizational Valuation of Valuation Devices: Putting Lean whiteboard management to work in a hospital department. Valuation Studies, 4(2): 125. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.1642125
  • Dr Giuseppe Grossi, Dr Ulf Papenfuß an, Susanna Alexiu & Jenny Cisneros Örnberg (2015). Mission(s) impossible? Configuring values in the governance of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5): 286. DOI: 10.1108/IJPSM-08-2015-0151
  • Carina Ren, Morten Krogh Peterse & Dianne Dredge (2015). Guest Editorial: Valuing Tourism. Valuation Studies, 3(2): 85. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.153285
  • Export in BibTex, RIS or text