Valuation Constellations

Désirée Waibel; Thorsten Peetz; Frank Meier

doi:10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2021.8.1.33-66

Authors

Désirée Waibel University of Bremen
Thorsten Peetz University of Bremen
Frank Meier University of Hamburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2021.8.1.33-66

Keywords:

sociology of valuation, valuation constellations, linked valuations, positions, rules, infrastructures

Abstract

The focus on situated practices in current valuation studies becomes an obstacle when situations are too narrowly defined, when moments of valuation are treated as isolated events and especially when the interconnectedness of moments across situations and social fields is neglected. In order to overcome these limitations, we propose the concept of valuation constellations (Meier et al. 2016). Based on the literature on valuation the concept distinguishes positions and their relations, rules, and infrastructures. We present these three components of constellations and demonstrate the potential of the concept regarding three analytical puzzles of valuation analysis: historical change of valuation processes, the definition and solution of valuation problems, and the legitimacy of valuations. Each of the puzzles is illustrated with an empirical case, i.e. dating platforms and apps, higher education, and amateur reviewing. Going beyond situationalism, the valuation constellations perspective is key to understanding interconnected valuation processes.

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1995. “Things of Boundaries.” Social Research 62(4): 857–882.

Anagnostopoulos, Dorothea, Stacey Rutledge, and Valentina Bali. 2013. “State Education Agencies, Information Systems, and the Expansion of State Power in the Era of Test-Based Accountability.” Educational Policy 27(2): 217–247.

Angwin, Julia, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. “Machine Bias: There’s Software Used across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And it’s Biased against Blacks.” ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing, accessed 17 June 2017.

Aspers, Patrik. 2008. “Analyzing Order: Social Structure and Value in the Economic Sphere.” International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie 18(2): 301–316.

Bergmann, Jörg R. 1993. Discreet Indiscretions: The Social Organization of Gossip. New York: De Gruyter.

Berthoin Antal, Ariane, Michael Hutter, and David Stark (eds.) 2015. Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beuscart, Jean-Samuel, Kevin Mellet, and Marie Trespeuch. 2016. “Reactivity without Legitimacy? Online Consumer Reviews in the Restaurant Industry.” Journal of Cultural Economy 9(5): 458–475.

Blumer, Herbert. 1966. “Sociological Implications of the Thought of George Herbert Mead.” American Journal of Sociology 71(5): 535–544.

Boltanski, Luc. 1973. “L’espace positionnel. Multiplicité des positions institutionnelles et habitus de classe.” Revue Française de Sociologie 14(1): 3–26.

Boltanski, Luc. 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Boltanski, Luc. 2014. Mysteries and Conspiracies: Detective Stories, Spy Novels and the Making of Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2000. “The Reality of Moral Expectations. A Sociology of Situated Judgement.” Philosophical Explorations 3(3): 208–231.

Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bucher, Taina. 2012. “Want to Be on the Top? Algorithmic Power and the Threat of Invisibility on Facebook.” New Media & Society 14(7): 1164–1180.

Bucher, Tania. 2017. “The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms.” Information, Communication & Society 20(1): 30–44.

Chong, Phillipa. 2013. “Legitimate Judgment in Art, the Scientific World Reversed? Maintaining Critical Distance in Evaluation.” Social Studies of Science 43(2): 265–281.

Chong, Phillipa. 2015. “Playing Nice, Being Mean, and the Space in Between: Book Critics and the Difficulties of Writing Bad Reviews.” In Moments of Valuation. Exploring Sites of Dissonance, edited by Ariane Berthoin Antal, Michael Hutter, and David Stark, 133–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chong, Phillipa. 2020. Inside the Critics’ Circle: Book Reviewing in Uncertain Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Christin, Angèle. 2017. “Algorithms in Practice: Comparing Web Journalism and Criminal Justice.” Big Data and Society 4(2): 1–14.

Christin, Angèle. 2018. “Counting Clicks: Quantification and Variation in Web Journalism in the United States and France.” American Journal of Sociology 123(5): 1382–1415.

Davis, Gerald F. 2016. The Vanishing American Corporation. Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

Davis, Phil. 2017. “Citation Cartel or Editor Gone Rogue?” The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/03/09/citation-cartel-or-editor-gone-rogue/, accessed 1 May 2017.

Dewey, Caitlin. 2015. “After Internet Backlash, Peeple Co-Founder Will Revise Her App to Make It ‘Positive’.” Washington Post 5 October. go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=luzern&v=2.1&id= GALE%7CA430759970&it=r&asid=db84e8ed451adb29a3613589c8be7162, accessed 1 January 2017.

Dewey, John. 1916. “The Logic of Judgments of Practice.” In Essays in Experimental Logic, edited by John Dewey, 236–271. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Dewey, John. 1939. “Theory of Valuation.” In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol. 2, edited by Otto Neurath, 1–67. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Diaz-Bone, Rainer. 2015. Die “Économie des conventions”. Grundlagen und Entwicklungen der neuen französischen Wirtschaftssoziologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Dussauge, Isabelle, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, and Francis Lee. 2015: Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Egloff, Rainer. 2015. “Definition of the Situation: History of the Concept.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by James D. Wright, 19–23. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Espeland, Wendy N., and Michael Sauder: 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1–40.

Espeland, Wendy N., and Michael Sauder. 2016. Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

Espeland, Wendy N., and Mitchell L. Stevens. 1998. “Commensuration as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 313–343.

Eyal, Gil. 2013. “For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic.” American Journal of Sociology 118(4): 863–907.

Eyal, Gil. 2019. The Crisis of Expertise. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Finkel, Eli J., Paul W. Easwick, Benjamin R. Karney, Harry T. Reis, and Susan Sprecher. 2012. “Online-Dating: A Critical Analysis from the Perspective of Psychological Science.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13(1): 3–66.

Fourcade, Marion. 2011. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of ‘Nature’.” American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1721–1777.

Fourcade, Marion, and Kieran Healy. 2013. “Classification Situations: Life-Chances in the Neoliberal Era.” Accounting, Organizations, and Society 38(8): 559–572.

Fourcade, Marion, and Kieran Healy. 2017. “Seeing Like a Market.” Socio-Economic Review 15(1): 9–29.

Fuller, Steve. 1994. “The Constitutively Social Character of Expertise.” International Journal of Expert Systems 7(1): 51–64.

Gambetta, Diego. 2009: “Signaling:” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by Peter Hedström and Peter Bearman, 168–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gerhards, Jürgen. 2013. “Der deutsche Sonderweg in der Messung von Forschungsleistungen.” Wissenschaftspolitik im Dialog 7. Berlin: Berlin Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

Gerlitz, Carolin. 2016. “What Counts? Reflections on the Multivalence of Social Media Data.” Digital Culture and Society 2(2): 19–38.

Gillespie, Tarleton. 2010. “The Politics of ‘Platforms’.” New Media & Society 12(3): 347–364.

Gillespie, Tarleton. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies. Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 167–194. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.

Goffman, Erving. 1964. “The Neglected Situation.” American Anthropologist 66(6): 133–136.

Goode, William J. 1959. “The Theoretical Importance of Love.” American Sociological Review 24(1): 38–47.

Hamann, Julian. 2016. “The Visible Hand of Research Performance Assessment.” Higher Education 72(2): 761–779.

Harmon, Amy. 2004. “Amazon Glitch Unmasks War of Reviewers,” New York Times 14 February. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/14/us/amazon-glitch-unmasks-war-of-reviewers.html, accessed 19 April 2020.

Heino, Rebecca D., Nicole B. Ellison, and Jennifer L. Gibbs. 2010. “Relationshopping: Investigating the Market Metaphor in Online Dating.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27(4): 427–447.

Heintz, Bettina. 2010. “Numerische Differenz. Überlegungen zu einer Soziologie des (quantitativen) Vergleichs.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39(3): 162–181.

Helgesson, Claes-Frederik. 2016. “Editorial Note: Folded Valuations?” Valuation Studies 4(2): 93–102.

Helmond, Anne. 2015. “The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready.” Social Media + Society 1(2): 1–11.

Hennion, Antoine. 2004. “Pragmatics of Taste.” In Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture, edited by Mark D. Jacob, and Nancy Weiss Hanrahan, 131–145. London: Blackwell.

Hennion, Antoine. 2015. “Paying Attention: What is Tasting Wine About?” In Moments of Valuation. Exploring Sites of Dissonance, edited by Ariane Berthoin Antal, Michael Hutter, and David Stark, 37–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heuts, Frank, and Annemarie Mol. 2013. “What is a Good Tomato? A Case of Valuing in Practice.” Valuation Studies 1(2): 125–146.

Hirschauer, Stefan. 2015. “How Editors Decide. Oral Communication in Journal Peer Review.” Human Studies 38(1): 37–55.

Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2018. Higher Education in Germany. Recent Developments in an International Perspective. Cham: Springer.

Hutter, Michael, and David Stark. 2015. “Pragmatist Perspectives on Valuation: An Introduction.” In Moments of Valuation. Exploring Sites of Dissonance, edited by Ariane Berthoin Antal, Michael Hutter, and David Stark, 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ikegami, Eiko. 2000. “A Sociological Theory of Publics: Identities and Culture as Emergent Properties in Networks.” Social Research 67(4): 989–1029.

Illouz, Eva. 2007. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Illouz, Eva. 2012. Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kalthoff, Herbert. 2013. “Practices of Grading: An Ethnographic Study of Educational Assessment.” Ethnography and Education 8(1): 89–104.

Kalthoff, Herbert. 2016. “Observing – Treating – Classifying: On the Educational Practice of Human Differentiation.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 228: 648–655.

Karpik, Lucien. 2010. Valuing the Unique. The Economics of Singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kaufmann, Jean-Claude. 2012. Love Online. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kitchin, Rob, and Martin Dodge. 2011. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kiviat, Barbara. 2017. “The Art of Deciding with Data: Evidence from How Employers Translate Credit Reports into Hiring Decisions.” Socio-Economic Review 17(2): 283–309.

Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1981. “The Micro-Sociological Challenge of Macro-Sociology: Towards a Reconstruction of Social Theory and Methodology.” In Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, edited by Karin Knorr-Cetina, and Aaron Cicourel, 1–48. London: Routledge.

Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2009. “The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World.” Symbolic Interaction (32): 61–87.

Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Urs Brügger. 2002. “Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets.” American Journal of Sociology 107(4): 905–950.

Kornberger, Martin, Dane Pflueger, and Jan Mouritsen. 2017. “Evaluative Infrastructures: Accounting for Platform Organization.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 60: 79–95.

Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.

Lamont, Michèle. 2012. “Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation.” Annual Review of Sociology 38(1): 201–221.

Lamont Michèle, and Katri I. Huutoniemi. 2011. “Comparing Customary Rules of Fairness: Evaluative Practices in Various Types of Peer Review Panels.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Charles Camic, Neil Gross, and Michèle Lamont, 209–232. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Larkin, Brian. 2013. “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42: 327–343.

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Licoppe, Christian, Carole Anne Rivière, and Julien Morel. 2016. “Grindr Casual Hook-ups as Interactional Achievements.” New Media & Society 18(11): 2540–2558.

Lobe, Adrian. 2017. “Der Algorithmus schlägt die letzte Stunde.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 8 January. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/ein-algorithmus-soll-ueber-leben-und-tod-entscheiden-14606357.html, accessed 24 April 2018.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

McHugh, David. 1968. Defining the Situation. The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis; New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

MacKenzie, Donald. 2011. “Evaluation Cultures? On Invoking ‘Culture’ in the Analysis of Behavior in Financial Markets.” Working Paper. www.sps.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/64564/EvalCults11.pdf, accessed 1 September 2017.

Mau, Steffen. 2019. The Metric Society. The Quantification of the Social World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Meier, Frank, Thorsten Peetz, and Désirée Waibel. 2016. “Bewertungskonstellationen. Theoretische Überlegungen zur Soziologie der Bewertung.” Berliner Journal für Soziologie 26(3/4): 307–328.

Meyer, John W., and Ronald L. Jepperson. 2000. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society. The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory 18(1): 100–120.

Meyer, John W., John Boli, and George M. Thomas. 1987. “Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account.” In Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual, edited by George M. Thomas, John W. Meyer, Francisco O. Ramirez, and John Boli, 12–37. Newbury Park: Sage.

Miller, Peter, and Michael Power. 2013. “Accounting, Organizing, and Economizing: Connecting Accounting Research and Organization Theory.” Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 557–605.

Muniesa, Fabian, and Claes-Fredrik Helgesson. 2013. “Valuation Studies and the Spectacle of Valuation.” Valuation Studies 1(2): 119–123.

Orlikowski, Wanda J., and Susan V. Scott. 2014. “What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector.” Organization Science 25(3): 868–891.

Peetz, Thorsten. 2019. “Ausweitung der Paarungszone? Grenzverschiebungen digitalisierter Paarbildung.” In Digitale Bewertungspraktiken. Für eine Bewertungssoziologie des Digitalen, edited by Jonathan Kropf, and Stefan Laser, 261–273. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Pinch, Trevor. 2012. “Book Reviewing for Amazon.com: How Socio-Technical Systems Struggle to Make Less from More” In Managing Overflow in Affluent Societies, edited by Barbara Czarniawska, and Orvar Löfgren, 68–88. New York and London: Routledge.

Pinch, Trevor, and Filip Kesler. 2011. “How Aunt Ammy Gets Her Free Lunch. A Study on the Top Thousand Customer Reviews at Amazon.com”. http://www.freelunch.me/filecabinet, accessed 12 May 2016.

Pool, Gail. 2007. Faint Praise: The Plight of Book Reviewing in America. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.

Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Race, Kane. 2015. “Speculative Pragmatism and Intimate Arrangements: Online Hook-Up Devices in Gay Life.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 17(4): 496–511.

Ranzini, Giulia, and Christoph Lutz. 2017. “Love at First Swipe? Explaining Tinder Self-Presentation and Motives.” Mobile Media & Communication 5(1): 80–101.

Rivera, Lauren A. 2010. “Status Distinctions in Interaction: Social Selection and Exclusion at an Elite Nightclub.” Qualitative Sociology 33(3): 229–255.

Rona-Tas, Akos. 2017. “The Off-Label Use of Consumer Credit Ratings.” Historical Social Research 42(1): 52–76.

Roscoe, Philip, and Shiona Chillas. 2014. “The State of Affairs: Critical Performativity and the Online Dating Industry.” Organization 21(6): 797–820.

Rosenfeld, Michael J., and Reuben. J. Thomas. 2012. “Searching for a Mate: The Rise of the Internet as a Social Intermediary.” American Sociological Review 77(4): 523–547.

Sauder, Michael. 2006. “Third Parties and Status Position: How the Characteristics of Status Systems Matter.” Theory and Society 35(3): 299–321.

Sauder, Michael, and Ryon Lancaster. 2006. “Do Rankings Matter? The Effects of U.S. News & World Report Rankings on the Admissions Process of Law Schools.” Law & Society Review 40(1): 105–134.

Seaver, Nick. 2019. “Knowing Algorithms.” In DigitalSTS – A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies, edited by Janet Vertsi, and David Ribes, 412–422. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Smith, Aaron, and Maeve Duggan. 2013. “Online Dating and Relationships”. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/, accessed 1 January 2017.

Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3): 355–374.

Star, Susan L. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377–391.

Star, Susan L., and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7(1): 111–134.

Stark, David. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance. Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Storper, Michael, and Robert Salais. 1997. Worlds of Production: The Action Frameworks of the Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tang, Denise Tse-Shang. 2017. “All I Get is an Emoji: Dating on Lesbian Mobile Phone App Butterfly.” Media, Culture & Society 39(6): 816–832.

Thévenot, Laurent. 1984. “Rules and Implements: Investments in Forms.” Social Science Information 23(1): 1–45.

Tilly, Charles. 2004. “Observations of Social Processes and their Formal Representations.” Sociological Theory 22(4): 595–602.

Veraja, Fabijan. 1992. Le cause di canonizzazione dei santi. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Waibel, Désirée. 2019. “Das digitale Gehäuse der Hörigkeit – kontextualisiert.” Zeitschrift für Theoretische Soziologie 8(1): 108–118.

Weber, Max. 1972. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. 5th edn. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

White, Harrison C. 2008. Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wilke, Désirée. 2016: “Bewertung unter Vorbehalt. Zur Praxis der Bewertungskommunikation in einem Streichquartett.” Berliner Journal für Soziologie 26(3/4): 403–431.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2003): Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

Woodward, Kenneth L. 1996. Making Saints. How the Catholic Church Determines who Becomes a Saint, who Doesn’t and Why. New York: Touchstone.

Zelizer, Viviana A. 1978. “Human Values and the Market: The Case of Life Insurance and Death in 19th-Century America.” American Journal of Sociology 84(3): 591–610.

Zelizer, Viviana A. 1981. “The Price and Value of Children: The Case of Children’s Insurance.”