(University) Management after Valuation Studies: Carving a practice between the offended native, the anxious scholar, and the useless practitioner
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2021.8.2.61-72Keywords:
Valuation; rankings; higher education; management; judgement.Abstract
This text introduces this issues’ symposium: “A correspondence on (University) Management after Valuation Studies”. The text has two parts. The first introduces the dilemma, the question of whether valuation studies could, besides studying valuation in practice, inform better practices of valuation, and the method of the correspondence, to use situations in which researchers of valuation are also practitioners, namely, the management of quality in higher education, as the starting point to think the correspondence’s problem. In the second part, the author reflects on his own experience in a situation of valuation at work, and proposes three different personae for the student of valuation: the offended native, the anxious scholar, and the useless practitioner.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 José Ossandón
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright to their contributions. Since number 8(2) 2022 Linköping University Electronic Press publishes under the CC-BY license. For older articles please see each article's landing page.