(University) Management after Valuation Studies: Carving a practice between the offended native, the anxious scholar, and the useless practitioner

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2021.8.2.61-72

Keywords:

Valuation; rankings; higher education; management; judgement.

Abstract

This text introduces this issues’ symposium: “A correspondence on (University) Management after Valuation Studies”. The text has two parts. The first introduces the dilemma, the question of whether valuation studies could, besides studying valuation in practice, inform better practices of valuation, and the method of the correspondence, to use situations in which researchers of valuation are also practitioners, namely, the management of quality in higher education, as the starting point to think the correspondence’s problem. In the second part, the author reflects on his own experience in a situation of valuation at work, and proposes three different personae for the student of valuation: the offended native, the anxious scholar, and the useless practitioner.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-20

How to Cite

Ossandón, José. 2022. “(University) Management After Valuation Studies: Carving a Practice Between the Offended Native, the Anxious Scholar, and the Useless Practitioner”. Valuation Studies 8 (2):61-72. https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2021.8.2.61-72.

Issue

Section

Symposium