Valuation Studies and the Critique of Valuation

Liliana Doganova; Martin Giraudeau; Claes-Fredrik Helgesson; Hans Kjellberg; Francis Lee; Alexandre Mallard; Andrea Mennicken; Fabian Muniesa; Ebba Sjögren; Teun Zuiderent-Jerak

doi:10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142287

Authors

Liliana Doganova Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France
Martin Giraudeau Department of Accounting, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
Claes-Fredrik Helgesson Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Sweden
Hans Kjellberg Department of Marketing and Strategy, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
Francis Lee Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Sweden
Alexandre Mallard Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France
Andrea Mennicken Department of Accounting, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
Fabian Muniesa Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Mines ParisTech, France
Ebba Sjögren Department of Accounting, Stockholm School of Economics, France
Teun Zuiderent-Jerak Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142287

Abstract

References

Akrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe Bijker and John Law, 205–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Becker, Howard S. 1967. “Whose Side Are We On?” Social Problems 14 (3): 239–247. DOI: 10.2307/799147

Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.

Boltanski, Luc. 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity.

Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bruno, Isabelle, Emmanuel Didier, and Julien Prévieux. 2014. Statactivisme: Comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: La Découverte.

Callon, Michel, and Bruno Latour. 1992. “Don’t Throw the Baby Out With the Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearley.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering, 343–368. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Collins, Harry M., and Stephen Yearley. 1992a. “Epistemological Chicken.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering, 301–326. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Collins, Harry M., and Stephen Yearley. 1992b. “Journey into Space.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 369–389.

Fourcade, Marion. 2011. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of ‘Nature’.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (6): 1721–1777. DOI: 10.1086/659640

Galison, Peter. 1996. “Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone.” In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Peter Galison and David J. Stump, 118–157. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Gomart, Emilie, and Antoine Hennion. 1999. “A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, 220–247. Oxford: Blackwell.

Graeber, David. 2004. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Haraway, Donna J. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. DOI: 10.2307/3178066

Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Harding, Sandra. 1991. “Feminist Standpoint Epistemology.” In The Gender and Science Reader, edited by Ingrid Bartsch and Muriel Lederman,145–168. London: Routledge.

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry, 30(2): 225–248. DOI: 10.1086/421123

Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno, Graham Harman, and Peter Erdélyi. 2011. The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Hants: Zero Books.

Law, John. 1992. “Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity.” Systems Practice 5 (4): 379–393. DOI: 10.1007/BF01059830

Puig de la Bellacasa, María. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: assembling neglected things.” Social Studies of Science, 41(1): 85–106. DOI: 10.1177/0306312710380301

Scott, James C. 2012. Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Verran, Helen. 1999. “Staying True to the Laughter in Nigerian Classrooms.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, 136–155. Oxford: Blackwell.

Verran, Helen. 2001. Science and an African Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Verran, Helen. 2014. “Extending the Cosmopolitical Right to Non–Humans.” Valuation Studies 2 (1): 65–70. DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142165

Woodhouse, Edward, David Hess, Steve Breyman, and Brian Martin. 2002. “Science Studies and Activism: Possibilities and Problems for Reconstructivist Agendas.” Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 297–319. DOI: 10.1177/0306312702032002004

Woolgar, Steve, Tarek Cheniti, Javier Lezaun, Daniel Neyland, Chris Sugden, and Christian Toennesen. 2008. “A Turn to Ontology in STS? 1.2.” Paper prepared for the workshop A Turn to Ontology, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford.