Of Principle and Principal: Value Plurality in the Market of Impact Investing

Emily Barman

doi:10.3384/VS.2001-5592.15319

Authors

Emily Barman Department of Sociology, Boston University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5592.15319

Keywords:

Economic sociology, valuation, value plurality, intermediaries, concerned markets, impact investing

Abstract

Impact investing-investment with the intentional expectation of social or environmental impact alongside financial return-constitutes one of a growing array of “concerned markets” where economic exchange is employed as a means to pursue financial and social or environmental value. Drawing from the pragmatist turn in valuation studies, this article attends to the valuation work that took place in the formation of this new market, examining how market proponents as evaluators recognized, defined, and negotiated the presence of value complexity in impact investing. I frame the market of impact investing as a case of market design complete with experiments, one in which advocates produced a valuation infrastructure so as to address investors’ difficulty in ascertaining the social and environmental value - as a distinct regime of value from financial value - of an investment. These experimenters extended judgment devices from mainstream finance to construct calculative tools in this setting that permitted the social or environmental value of investments to be brought into being and to be made calculable for investors without being assigned a financial value. The study contributes to literature that theorizes the conditions underlying evaluators’ mediation of the multiple registers of value at work in the making of markets.

References

Bay, Charlotta. 2011. “Framing Financial Responsibility: An Analysis of the Limitations of Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22(6): 593–607. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2011.03.001

Berthoin Antal, Ariane, Michael Hutter, and David Stark, eds. 2015. Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702504.001.0001

Burchell, Stuart, Colin Clubb, and Anthony G. Hopwood. 1985. “Accounting in its Social Context: Towards a History of Value Added in the United Kingdom.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(4): 381–413. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9

Callon, Michel, and John Law. 2005. “On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23(5): 717–733. DOI: 10.1068/d343t

Carruthers, Bruce G., and Jeong-Chul Kim. 2011. “The Sociology of Finance.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 239–259. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150129

Cefai, Danile, Martin Endress, Stefan Nicolae, and Bénédicte Zimmermann. 2015. “Introduction: Special issue on Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation.” Human Sciences 38(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/s10746-015-9344-6

Doganova, Liliana. 2013. “Transfer and Exploration: Two Models of Science-Industry Intermediation.” Science and Public Policy 40(4): 442–452. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct033

Dussauge, Isabelle, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, and Francis Lee, eds. 2015. Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689583.001.0001

Espeland, Wendy N. 1998. The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Ezzamel, Mahmoud, Hugh Willmott, and Frank Worthington. 2008. “Manufacturing Shareholder Value: The Role of Accounting in Organizational Transformation.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(2–3): 107–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.03.001

Fourcade, Marion. 2011. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of Nature’.” American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1721–1777. DOI: 10.1086/659640

Giraudeau, Martin. 2012. “Imagining (the Future) Business: How to Make Firms with Plans?” In Imagining Business. Performance Imagery in Business and Beyond, edited by Francois-Régi Puyou, Paolo Quattrone, Chris McLean, and Nigel Thrift, pp. 213–229. London: Routledge.

Goffman, Erving. 1969. Where the Action Is: Three Essays. London: Allen Lane.

Guénin-Paracini, Henri, Bertrand Malsch, and Anne Marché Paillé. 2014. “Fear and Risk in the Audit Process.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 39(4): 264–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.02.001

Hacking, Ian. 1992. “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering, pp. 29–64. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Hopwood, Anthony G. 1976. Accounting and Human Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hopwood, Anthony G. 1980. “The Organizational and Behavioural Aspects of Budgeting and Control.” In Topics in Management Accounting, edited by John Arnold, Bryan Carsberg, and Robert Scapens, pp. 221–240. Oxford: Philip Ailen.

Hopwood, Anthony G., and Peter Miller, eds. 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kornberger, Martin, Lise Justesen, Anders Koed Madsen, and Jan Mouritsen, eds. 2015. Making Things Valuable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mennicken, Andrea, Peter Miller, and Rita Samiolo. 2008. “Accounting for Economic Sociology.” Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter 10(1): 3–7.

Mennicken, Andrea, and Michael Power. 2015. “Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation.” In Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance, edited by Ariane Berthoin Antal, Michael Hutter, and David Stark, pp. 208–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Miller, Peter. 1998. “The Margins of Accounting.” European Accounting Review 7(4): 605–621. DOI: 10.1080/096381898336213

Miller, Peter, and Michael Power. 2013. “Accounting, Organizing, and Economizing: Connecting Accounting Research and Organization Theory.” Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 557–605. DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2013.783668

Mouritsen, Jan, Allan Hansen, and Carsten Ø Hansen. 2009. “Short and Long Translations: Management Accounting Calculations and Innovation Management.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(6): 738–754. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.006

Muniesa, Fabian, and Dominique Linhardt. 2011. “Trials of Explicitness in the Implementation of Public Management Reform.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22(6): 550–566. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2011.06.003

Power, Michael, ed. 1994. Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Puyou, Francois-Régi, Paolo Quattrone, Chris McLean, and Nigel Thrift (eds.) 2012. Imagining Organizations: Performative Imagery in Business and Beyond. London: Routledge.

Quattrone, Paolo. 2004. “Accounting for God: Accounting and Accountability Practices in the Society of Jesus (Italy, XVI–XVII centuries).” Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(7): 647–683. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2004.03.001

Quattrone, Paolo, and Trevor Hopper. 2005. “A ‘Time–Space Odyssey’: Management Control Systems in Two Multinational Organisations.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (7/8): 735–764. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.006

Robson, Keith. 1992. “Accounting Numbers as Inscription: Action at a Distance and the Development of Accounting.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(7): 685–708. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90019-O

Samiolo, Rita. 2012. “Commensuration and Styles of Reasoning: Venice, Cost-Benefit and the Defense of Place.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 37(6): 382–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.04.001

Stark, David. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Vatin, François. 2013. “Valuation as Evaluating and Valorizing.” Valuation Studies 1(1): 31–50. DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131131

Vollmer, Hendrik, Andrea Mennicken, and Alex Preda. 2009. “Tracking the Numbers: Across Accounting and Finance, Organizations and Markets.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(5): 619–637. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.06.007