Folded Valuations?

Biagioli, Mario. 2016. “Watch out for Cheats in the Citation Game.” Nature 535(7611): 201. DOI: 10.1038/535201a

Davis, Phil. 2012. “The Emergence of a Citation Cartel.” https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/04/10/emergence-of-a-citation-cartel/, accessed 28 November 2016.

Dekker, Erwin. 2016. “Exemplary Goods: Exemplars as Judgment Devices.” Valuation Studies 4(2): 103–124. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.1642103

Fürst, Henrik. 2016. “Handling Rejection as Failure: Aspiring Writers Getting the Rejection Slip.” Valuation Studies 4(2): 153-176. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.1642153

Helgesson, Claes-Fredrik, and Fabian Muniesa. 2013. “For What It’s Worth: An Introduction to Valuation Studies.” Valuation Studies 1(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.13111

Helgesson, Claes-Fredrik, and Fabian Munies. 2014. “Valuation Is Work.” Valuation Studies 2(1): 1–4. DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.14211

Hirschauer, Stefan. 2010. “Editorial Judgments: A Praxeology of Voting in Peer Review.” Social Studies of Science 40(1): 71–103. DOI: 10.1177/0306312709335405

Hirschauer, Stefan. 2014. “How Editors Decide. Oral Communication in Journal Peer Review.” Human Studies 38(1): 37–55. DOI: 10.1007/s10746-014-9329-x

Jürgenmeyer, Julian, and Karoline Krenn. 2016. “Classification Situations: A New Field of Research for Valuation Studies?” Valuation Studies 4(2): 177-189. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.1642177

Martinus Hauge, Amalie. 2016. “The Organizational Valuation of Valuation Devices: Putting Lean Whiteboard Management to Work in a Hospital Department.” Valuation Studies 4(2): 125-151. DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.1642125

Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159(3810): 56–63. DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Pontille, David, and Didier Torny. 2010. “The Controversial Policies of Journal Ratings: Evaluating Social Sciences and Humanities.” Research Evaluation 19(5): 347–360. DOI: 10.3152/095820210X12809191250889

Pontille, David, and Didier Torn. 2014. “From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review.” Human Studies 38(1): 57–79. DOI: 10.1007/s10746-014-9335-z